Resistance Day speech by General Noriega

General Manuel Antonio Noriega
4 min readApr 13, 2021

--

August 12, 1988

Resistance Day speech by General Manuel Noriega

For the first time in the Republic’s history, representative units of our armed forces are marching together with the Dignity Battalions, which are the people armed for survival. We have armed these people, and those weapons will not be taken back, because they belong to the people. These are the people armed for survival against aggression.

We insist: Not even the largest army in the world can defend the Canal, as Gen. [Wallace] Nutting used to say, as Gen. [Paul] Gorman repeated, as Gen.[John] Galvin stated: They cannot defend the Canal, even if they post U.S. soldiers inch by inch along the Canal from the Atlantic to the Pacific! The Canal can only be defended by those who live along its banks, by its owners, by those who gave it birth, by the Panamanian people!

And today, just as U.S. law permits the truth to be known after 10 years, we want to report that if they had not approved the Torrijos-Carter Treaties, Torrijos would have blown up the Canal. These men who are here were going to blow up the Canal. They were already in the heart of the Canal, and these men were moved to tears when they were told to halt, that the order is not to blow up the Canal, because the Canal is now Panamanian.

Yesterday we said: Respect Panama; take your hands off Panama. And we are saying it again today, in the presence of the aristocracy of talent which accompanies us in the sum­mons toward the Second Amphictyonic Congress. We re­peat: Take your hands off Panama….

They have wanted to impose on us a democracy, patented Made in USA. With what right do they demand a democracy, when they wish to deny us the right to have an independent, free, and sovereign nation-without which democracy is not possible? Because without a fatherland, no political system is viable. The nation comes first: The territory, the single flag, and sovereignty are what permits the selection of a democracy reflecting the image and profile of the peo­ple.

Noriega is not the problem. Noriega did not exist in 1968 and in 1970, when Torrijos faced the empire. Nor did Torrijos exist in 1952 and 1955, when Gen. Remon Cantera faced the empire.

The problem is a people, and this people is called Panama…. So forget about Noriega. Perhaps No­riega is the last “nice guy” left. If not, ask [Maj. Jose Hilario] Trujillo and [Maj. Luis] Córdoba. It is preferable, then, that you put up with Noriega.

Democracy can no longer exist here without including the peasant who works the land and the worker who works for hours in the shop or the factory, and who have equal rights to those who invest capital or who apply technology and the knowledge learned in their professions.This concept of par­ticipation is what avoids violence, the armed struggles whose example we have very nearby, in other brother coun­tries….

Far from retreating, frightened by those who attempt to become our masters, we wish to continue being worthy of the peoples who struggle against underdevelopment and de­pendency….

Many Panamanians naively believed that with the new 1977 treaties, Panama and the United States were going to begin a permanent honeymoon, forgetting that for the United States, a treaty is nothing but, as Torrijos said, a useful but, ephemeral act.

That the best of treaties can only be judged at I the time they are signed, and that the United States signs treaties knowing full well that it is going to violate them blatantly….

From the beginning of the Republic, the United States has intervened directly and indirectly in Panama with the objective of achieving the establishment of a government that would be docile to the interests of that power….

Several strategies are used for this purpose: popular urban insurrection … the buying of consciences, with a $ 100 million fund …rented rebellions, with the goal of fostering a split in the armed forces….

Today there is a new destabilization strategy, which con­ sists of … a change in the structure of personnel in charge of the Canal, in order to give authority and responsibility for command to the secretary of the Board of Directors.The Canal will be run by remote control from Washington, elim­inating the authority of the administrators. Lowering the Panama Canal Commission budget, which will decrease the funds allocated for maintenance, personnel training, and probably result in a reduction of the labor force.

The purpose of this is to turn workers against the govern­ment.

Canal revenues have been transferred to aid the Con­tras- that’s why they refused to allow the Canal books to be examined.

I want to tell you that Washington invested more than $100 million in this war.

From here, from this land free of colonialism, I am telling the world that no soldier or dependent of the U.S.armed forces, male or female, has been killed, injured, kidnaped, or reported missing…. The intemational community must know that throughout this entire period of crisis, the Panama Canal’s operation has not been in arty way hindered or jeop­ardized….

You can rest assured that the next President of this coun­try will come by legitimate consultation with the ballot boxes, and will not be imposed from the barks of the Defense Forces, nor the Union Club bar, nor Washington’s sullied air of scandals and deals.

https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1988/eirv15n34-19880826/eirv15n34-19880826_054-bills_seek_to_grab_panama_canal.pdf

--

--